Spotlight on MUFG
Discover why it is crucial for MUFG to align its financing strategies with the targets set by the Paris Agreement. Read our Shareholder Proposal and Investor Briefing for 2025.
© Paul Hilton
MUFG, widely known as Japan’s largest bank, pledged net-zero GHG emissions across its finance portfolio by 2050.
Despite MUFG’s climate policy, it remains the top Asian financier of fossil fuels and one of the top forest-risk commodity sector financiers (a sector that frequently is charged with human rights and Indigenous rights violations) among OECD member countries. (Banking on Climate Chaos, Forest and Finance) This contradicts its goal of achieving net-zero emissions by 2050, as it still backs companies with questionable policies and histories of issues like illegal deforestation and inadequate climate transition plans. (MUFG)
In 2015, world leaders committed to the Paris Agreement, aiming to cap global temperature rise to 1.5C above pre-industrial levels. (UNFCCC)
Yet governments and the private sector continue to finance and support fossil fuel expansion. They also fuel deforestation, which undermines critical carbon sinks. Meanwhile, 2024 is the hottest year on record, with multiple months breeching the 1.5 °C Paris Agreement threshold. (Copernicus Climate Change Service)
MUFG has invested US$314.2 billion in fossil fuels and deforestation-risk commodities since 2016. (Banking on Climate Chaos, Forest and Finance)
LNG:
MUFG is among the top banks worldwide that finance LNG projects. LNG is composed of methane, a greenhouse gas 80 times more harmful than CO2 over a 20 year period. (UNEP) For example, MUFG finances the contentious Rio Grande LNG project in Texas, USA, which is facing potential legal violations in addition to harming the climate. (Sierra Club) Construction could infringe upon the rights of local Indigenous Peoples as well as harm local community health and endangered species. The climate impact from the project is comparable to the emissions from 43 coal power plants. (RAN)
©Bekah Hinojosa/(SOTXEJN)
©Bekah Hinojosa/(SOTXEJN)
© RAN
Palm Oil and Forest-Risk Commodities:
MUFG is a leading financier of forest-risk commodities among OECD member countries, significantly contributing to the deforestation of Southeast Asian rainforests and peatlands through its funding of conflict palm oil and the pulp and paper sector. (Forest and Finance) This financing impacts the climate, biodiversity, and Indigenous communities. It enables funding to problematic clients by exploiting loopholes in MUFG’s own policies, which restrict the application of international standards (such as No Deforestation, No Peat, and No Exploitation) only to logging and plantation development. (MUFG) From 2016 to June 2024, MUFG financed about US$6.6 billion worth of these commodities, ranking it 13th among top financiers. (Forest and Finance)
© RAN
Deforestation:
An MUFG client, the RGE Group, has been implicated extensively in deforestation activities in Indonesia’s rainforests and in violating the rights of local and Indigenous communities. Investigations released in 2024 reveal that a shadow pulpwood company controled by RGE has deforested 33,000 hectares of Borneo rainforest (RAN). In addition, another RGE affiliate company continues to violate community rights in North Sumatra and community forests for pulpwood. (RAN)
© RAN
© RAN
MUFG: An Urgent Case for Concern
1
Unreliable Governance Structures
MUFG’s financing to clients in climate-problematic sectors and geographies indicates weak policies that may inadvertently support regulations violations. Although MUFG’s audit committees are tasked with ensuring the directors and executive officers are performing their duties, they must also disclose a basis for their audit results and clarify how directors are monitoring risk control measures. (Investor Briefing)
2
Financial Risk & Stranded Assets
Investing heavily in fossil fuels and deforestation sectors exposes MUFG to financial risks and the likelihood of stranded assets due to global shifts towards decarbonization, sustainability, and stricter environmental regulations.
3
Adverse Climate Impacts
MUFG’s financing portfolio continues to include the fossil fuel sector, and companies connected to deforestation, accelerating both the climate crisis and biodiversity loss.
4
Harming Communities
MUFG’s financial activities create significant threats to the livelihoods of Indigenous and frontline communities.
Global Energy Trends
According to the International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA)’s Renewable Capacity Statistics 2025, 2024 marks yet another benchmark in renewable energy capacity and growth. Renewable energy leads the pack in expansion among all energy sectors, further gaining traction in 2024. (IEA)
However, MUFG provided US$8.36 billion to new methane (LNG) exports in 2023, effectively locking in dependence on fossil fuels for decades to come. (RAN) Its current financial decision-making fails to adequately address nature- and climate-related risks and impacts, thus increasing market volatility and preventing a just transition. In addition, its incremental commitments and superficial disclosures can not secure long-term portfolio stability or shareholder value.
Re-evaluating MUFG projects
The Rio Grande LNG terminal financed by MUFG is located in South Texas, a haven for wildlife, fishing, tourism, recreation and home to Latine and Indigenous communities. The proposed site would be located on an ancestral burial and village site of Indigenous Peoples. Despite failing to obtain the free, prior and informed consent of the Carrizo/Comecrudo Tribe of Texas, MUFG provided NextDecade’s Rio Grande LNG with US$2.67 billion. (Sierra Club) Providing financing without consent is in direct violation of the Equator Principles, an international framework that MUFG voluntary has committed to uphold. (Equator Principles)
In October 2024, Gulf Coast community leaders visited Tokyo to demand that Japan’s financial institutions stop supporting LNG/methane projects in the Southern Gulf Coast region of the United States. Juan Mancias, Tribal Chair of the Carrizo/Comcrudo Tribe of Texas said, “These companies are trying to occupy this land–all for fossil fuel riches. These projects will ruin our air, pollute our water, and desecrate our ancestral lands.” (RAN)
In addition, a SpaceX rocket facility is situated near the planned site. Local residents have expressed concerns about vibrations during launches and the risk of debris scattering toward the LNG facility. In May 2025, a referendum approved converting the facility into a municipality, sparking public debate. (AFP)
Read more
©︎Masaya Noda / RAN
©︎Masaya Noda / RAN
©︎NOPRI ISMI / MONGABAY INDONESIA
MUFG’s Indonesian banking subsidiary, Bank Danamon, is continuing to finance a plantation group that has converted vast areas of Indonesian’s carbon-rich peatlands. From 2020-2023, it provided over US$280 million to Tunas Baru Lampung, and during this period, companies under its control converted 7,800 hectares (19,274 acres) of peatlands, driving vast greenhouse gas emissions and increasing fire risk. In 2023, two neighbouring concessions saw huge peatland fires spread over 14,500 hectares (35,830 acres) of land. These financing activities are not aligned with the bank’s own palm oil policy, adopted two years prior, which required clients to commit to No Deforestation, No Peatland, and No Exploitation. (MUFG) In 2024, the Indonesian government sued a TBL-affiliated company for US$41.5 million in ecological damages and economic losses.
Read more
©︎NOPRI ISMI / MONGABAY INDONESIA
The United States President Donald Trump and his administration have made bold moves to assert America’s “energy dominance” with oil production and LNG exports. (US Department of Energy)
Global banks are also backsliding on their climate commitments, with a large exodus by major banks in Australia, Canada, Japan and the U.S. from the Net Zero Banking Alliance. (IEEFA)
Banks must act urgently and decisively to align capital flows toward climate-safe, deforestation-free, and socially just supply chains in the energy, food, and agriculture sectors. By proactively phasing out high-risk, high-carbon financing and accelerating financing for future-proof business models, institutions will not only mitigate systemic risks but also position themselves as leaders in a more resilient global economy.
©︎RAN
©︎RAN





Share to spread awareness
Rainforest Action Network